Pregnancy And Air Travel: Radiation Risks Explained

Flying during pregnancy is generally considered safe, with the impact of cosmic radiation exposure deemed trivial for casual travellers. However, pregnant flight crew and frequent flyers may exceed recommended radiation limits, and it is important to understand the potential health risks. Radiation exposure during flight is greater than at ground level, and solar flares can significantly increase radiation levels, which may be a concern for pregnant women. While the risk of harm to the foetus is low for occasional travellers, it is important for pregnant women to be aware of the potential risks and take necessary precautions when flying.

Radiation exposure is trivial for casual travellers but not for frequent flyers

Radiation exposure is generally trivial for casual travellers but not for frequent flyers.

For the average flyer, the increased risk of cancer is far less than 0.01%. Flying occasionally or even frequently is generally safe, but those concerned about radiation exposure can opt for more frequent medical check-ups.

During high-altitude flights, the cosmic radiation dose rate is greater than at ground level. However, for casual travellers, the impact of cosmic radiation exposure during flight is negligible. The radiation exposure from flying is extremely small and for a short period of time. It is much lower than the radiation exposure from diagnostic radiological procedures.

Pregnant women who are frequent flyers, pilots, or flight attendants can receive radiation exposures that exceed recommended values if they do not modify their work schedules. This is because pregnant women are advised to treat the unborn child as a member of the public, with a public dose limit of 1 mSv. Radiation exposure to an unborn child of less than 1 mSv above background levels will not lead to a significant increase in risk due to radiation.

While radiation exposure is generally trivial for casual travellers, frequent flyers may approach and exceed a 1 millisievert (mSv) per year dose. For example, an individual flying 18,000,000 miles over 14 years would have accumulated a radiation dose equivalent to about 1,000 chest x-rays. This would translate to a 0.5% increase in the lifetime risk of contracting a potentially fatal cancer.

Radiation exposure is lower in small planes than large ones

Radiation exposure is indeed lower in small planes than in large ones. This is because small planes fly at lower altitudes. The higher the altitude, the greater the exposure to ionizing particles.

The impact of radiation exposure during flight on pregnancy has been studied for decades, and safe exposure limits have been recommended. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends that pregnant women be limited to a total exposure of 1 mSv from the reported time of pregnancy, with no monthly dose exceeding 0.5 mSv. The annual maximum exposure proposed by the FAA is 5 mSv. It would take about 78 flights to reach this annual maximum.

The radiation exposure in both small and large planes is too low to increase the risk of birth defects or miscarriage. The most important factor regarding radiation risks is the dose. When flying in a jet at 30,000 feet, the exposure is extremely small and for only a short period. There is no risk of birth defects or miscarriage from commercial flying.

Pregnant frequent flyers, pilots, and flight attendants can receive exposures that exceed recommended values if they do not appropriately modify their work schedules. During solar flares, radiation levels can significantly increase for brief periods, possibly affecting even casual travelers. However, radiation exposure during flight, even during solar flares, is not considered a high exposure.

Overall, the risks of radiation exposure during flight are small, and international exposure limits have been established to minimize potential harm.

Solar flares can increase radiation exposure by up to 100 times

Solar flares are transient, unpredictable solar surface eruptions that release ionizing radiation, magnetic energy, and ultraviolet radiation. While solar flares are massive explosions, specialized equipment is needed to see them on the Sun's surface.

The radiation exposure from solar flares is not considered a high exposure and is not expected to increase the risk of birth defects or miscarriage. The exposure during a 10-hour flight is approximately 0.05 mSv, which is significantly lower than the background radiation exposure of 2.3 mSv that a pregnant woman and her fetus typically receive. Even during solar flares, the radiation exposure is comparable to low-level diagnostic radiological procedures and is not considered harmful to the developing fetus.

It is important to note that radiation exposure during flights, even during solar flares, is generally not a cause for concern for pregnant women. However, pregnant flight crew members should be aware of the potential risks and take necessary precautions, such as reducing their time on long flights or flights at high latitudes.

Radiation exposure is not a concern for fertility

Radiation exposure during the Learjet ride will not increase the risk of miscarriage. According to a recent paper, the radiation exposure received by passengers during a Concorde flight is about 0.01 mSv (mSv is a unit of radiation dose) per hour. This is a good reference since the Concorde flies at approximately 55,000 feet, and a Learjet may be between 40,000 and 50,000 feet. Put in perspective, that is about one day of normal background radiation (radiation exposure we receive every day from naturally occurring radiation sources). The dose that is allowed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a pregnant woman who is occupationally exposed to radiation is 5 mSv.

The most important factor with regard to radiation risks is the dose. Fortunately, when flying in a jet at 30,000 feet altitude, the exposure is extremely small and for only a short period of time. Based on our knowledge of the amount of radiation to result in birth defects or miscarriage, there is no risk from commercial flying.

Aircrew are considered to be occupationally exposed to radiation

The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) in the United States reported that aircrew have the largest average annual effective dose (3.07 mSv) of all US radiation-exposed workers. Other estimates of annual aircrew cosmic radiation exposure range from 0.2 to 5 mSv per year. The NCRP also has a recommended monthly radiation limit of 0.5 mSv during pregnancy.

To put this into context, an average person receives around 3.0 mSv per year from all sources of radiation. The dose limit per year for people occupationally exposed to radiation is 20 mSv.

Due to their exposure, aircrew are subject to mandatory monitoring if they are likely to receive an effective dose of more than 1 millisievert within a calendar year. This monitoring is done through radiation protection registers, which record the dose values of individuals occupationally exposed to radiation.

While the impact of in-flight radiation exposure on pregnancy is considered trivial for casual travellers, pregnant frequent flyers, pilots, and flight attendants can receive exposures that exceed recommended values if their work schedules are not modified. This is particularly true during solar flares, which can significantly raise radiation levels.

To reduce their exposure, pregnant crew members should consider reducing their time on long flights, flights at high latitudes, or flights that fly over the poles. Additionally, they should be aware of space weather and solar particle events to further minimize their exposure.

Frequently asked questions